Summary

James Thompson Pennsylvania College Cases — Opinion of the Court (1870)

We must not at this point overlook the great fact in every contract, that it is always made in view of and subject to the natural or legal contingencies which may affect it, or to which the contracting parties may be subject. If a contract be made with a corporation, to be executed in the future, the contingency of existence must be regarded as having been in view as much as between man and man.
Source: Wikisource

James Thompson Pennsylvania College Cases — Opinion of the Court (1870)

A question to be answered in passing on the merits of the first of these bills is, could Jefferson College surrender its charter, with the consent of the legislature, and accept a new one, consolidating it with another institution or college of the same nature and kind, without the assent of the holders of scholarships in the college?
The general right of a private corporation to surrender its franchises, may possibly have exceptions, but undoubtedly it is the rule.
Source: Wikisource

James Thompson Pennsylvania College Cases — Opinion of the Court (1870)

This is generally described as an inherent right, which would necessarily defeat any attempt by legislation to enforce upon a corporation qualities of perpetuity. Such a thing would be impossible in the nature of things. Corporations, like individuals, die by the decay, or loss of their vital functions, and this effectually defies authority, to render them perpetual. A surrender of a franchise is the voluntary death of the corporation, and is one mode by which it may cease to exist: 19 Johns.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature