Summary

James Vernon Bartlet 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

Peter’s words, “Mark, my son,” show how close was the spiritual tie between the older and the younger man (1 Pet. v. 13) ; and as he is writing from Rome (“Babylon,” since Paul’s death and the change of policy it implied) , this forms a link between the New Testament and early tradition, which speaks of Mark as an Evangelist writing his Gospel under the influence of Peter’s preaching (in Rome) .
Source: Wikisource

James Vernon Bartlet 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

When, then, Paul proposed, after the Jerusalem council of Acts xv., to revisit with Barnabas the scenes of their joint labours, he naturally demurred to taking Mark with them again, feeling that he could not be relied on should fresh openings demand a new policy. But Barnabas stood by his younger kinsman and “took Mark and sailed away to Cyprus” (xv. 38 seq.) . Barnabas does not reappear, unless we trust the tradition which makes him an evangelist in Alexandria (Clem. Hom. i. 9 seq., cf. the attribution to him of the Alexandrine Epistle of Barnabas) .
Source: Wikisource

James Vernon Bartlet 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

In the Acts of the Apostles (xii. 12) we read of “John, whose surname was Mark,” and gather that Peter was a familiar visitor at the house of his mother Mary, which was a centre of Christian life in Jerusalem. That he was, as his Roman surname would suggest, a Hellenist, follows from the fact that he was also cousin (“nephew” is a later sense of ἀνεψιός, see J. B. Lightfoot on Col. iv. 10) of Barnabas, who belonged to Cyprus. When Barnabas and Paul returned from their relief visit to Judaea (c. A.D. 46) , Mark accompanied them (xii. 25) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature