Jean Paul Hippolyte Emmanuel Adhémar Esmein

Summary

Jean Paul Hippolyte Emmanuel Adhémar Esmein 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 20… (1911)

Capetian dynasty; for though the king always maintained the principle that he was judge, and even that his competence in this respect was general and unlimited, this competence was at the same time undefined and it was not compulsory to submit cases to the king. At this period, too, appeals, striclly so called, did not exist. Nevertheless when a suit was brought before the king he judged it with the assistance of his prelates and vassals assembled around him, who formed his council.
Source: Wikisource

Jean Paul Hippolyte Emmanuel Adhémar Esmein 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 20… (1911)

But in law the king was sole judge, the vassals and prelates being only advisers. During the 12th and at the beginning of the 13th centuries the curia regis continued to discharge these functions, except that its importance and actual competence continued to increase, and that we frequently find in it, in addition to the vassals and prelates who formed the council, consiliarii, who are evidently men whom the king had in his entourage, as his ordinary and professional councillors.
Source: Wikisource

Jean Paul Hippolyte Emmanuel Adhémar Esmein 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 20… (1911)

The provincial parlements reproduced in a smaller scale the organization of that of Paris; but they did not combine the functions of a court of peers. They each claimed to possess equal powers within their own province. There were also great judicial bodies exercismg the same functions as the parlements, though without bearing the name, such as the Conseil souverain of Alsace at Colmar, the Conseil supérieur of Roussillon at Perpignan; the provincial council of Artois had not the supreme jurisdiction in all respects.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature