Summary

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Yontz v. United States — Opinion of the Court

In contravention of this assumption, the clause above recited directs that the officer giving judicial possession shall cause the land to be measured, according to the ordinance, and to mark boundaries; 'the surplus to remain for the nation, for its uses.' If it be true that the boundaries are conclusively defined in the grant, then no surplus could be thrown off by the survey. But if two leagues are to be surveyed within the larger limits, then the clause is consistent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Catron John Catron Yontz v. United States — Opinion of the Court

This court has uniformly held, in cases coming up by appeal from the District Courts of Missouri and Florida, which adjudicated Spanish claims under the act of 1824, that the petition to the Governor for land and his concession must be taken as one act, and the decree usually proceeded on the petition, which described the land as respected locality and quantity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature