John Henry Arthur Hart

Summary

John Henry Arthur Hart 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

In the New Testament there is already a tendency to ignore the Sadducees and to transfer to the surviving and active sect of the Pharisees denunciations addressed to hypocrites. The feud which set Pharisee and Sadducee against one another is ignored, and generally the condign oblivion which overtook this sect of the Jews is already beginning. The Christian Fathers seem to confound them with the Samaritans, and the confusion is natural enough. The Sadducees were as little loyal to the Judaism of Jerusalem as the Samaritans—and they were less sincere and less interested in religion.
Source: Wikisource

John Henry Arthur Hart 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

The ideal of separation descended from the Great Synagogue (Assembly) of the time of Ezra to the Synagogue of the Hasidaeans (Assidaeons) , who allied themselves with Judas Maccabaeus when his followers decided to suspend the law of the Sabbath, in order that the true Jews might preserve themselves from annihilation and survive to keep the Law as a whole. This action of the Hasidaeans is clearly the practical outcome of the principle which Josephus describes in the language of philosophy as the characteristic of the Pharisees—“some things and not all are the work of Fate” (Ant. xiii. 5, 9) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature