Summary

Portrait of John Hessin Clarke John Hessin Clarke Haupt v. United States (254 U.S. 272…

The three acts requiring the money appropriated to be used in accordance with the design and specifications of the Aransas Pass Harbor Company, which were prepared by appellant, implied clearly that Congress intended to give the experimental construction of appellant a fair trial and common honesty would infer a disposition, but not a contract, to pay for the use of the patented form of construction, if it should be found to be valuable.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature