Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Kesner v. Trigg — Opinion of the Court

No notice of any infirmity in the title of Kesner to the premises is brought home, either to the trustee or to the cestui que trust, and it is denied by the latter. Like a mortgagee, they are regarded as purchasers; and, in this case, they must be considered as such, bona fide, and without notice of the adverse rights of the appellant, if any she have.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Kesner v. Trigg — Opinion of the Court

The alleged contract is thus set out in the bill. Speaking of her marriage to Kesner, the appellant says: 'It was then agreed, and has always since been agreed and understood between herself and her husband, that she was to take no interest in his property, and he was to take no interest in hers. On their marriage they settled on a farm owned by Mr.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature