Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Case-Swayne Company v. Sunkist Growers…

But it does not follow that Sunkist has lost its antitrust immunity completely. The bulk of its members are grower cooperatives or marketing agencies, and the great majority of its transactions are dealings with and for the account of these agricultural cooperatives which Congress clearly intended to exempt from the antitrust laws. An exempt organization may not conspire with an outsider to violate § 1, but if it does, it does not forfeit its immunity except for that transaction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Case-Swayne Company v. Sunkist Growers…

The local associations, including the agency associations, are in turn organized into district exchanges which, unless agency association membership disqualifies some of them, would seem also to be exempt cooperatives. The district exchanges are primarily marketing organizations. Sunkist, a member corporation, is at the top of the pyramid. Among other things, it has ultimate authority and responsibility for the marketing of both fresh and product fruit.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature