Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Securities and Exchange Commission v…

The insurer may plan to meet the minimum guarantee by split funding-that is, treating part of the net premium as it would a premium under a conventional deferred annuity contract with a cash value at maturity equal to the minimum guarantee and investing only the remainder [11] -or by setting the minimum low enough that the risk of not being able to meet it through investment is insignificant. The latter is the course United seems to have pursued. [12] In either case the guarantee cannot be said to integrate the pre-maturity operation into the post-maturity benefit scheme.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Securities and Exchange Commission v…

The second problem United must face in a deferred annuity is to determine what amount will be available for the annuity fund at maturity. In a conventional annuity where a fixed amount of benefits is stipulated it is essential that the premiums both cover expenses and produce a fund sufficient to support the promised benefits. [7] In fixing the necessary premium mortality experience is a subordinate factor and the planning problem is to decide what interest and expense rates may be expected.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature