Summary

John McLean Clearwater v. Pleasant — Opinion of the Court

And in regard to those whose rights are in no respect affected by the judgment or decree, it can be of no importance of what States they are citizens. If one of the defendants should be a citizen of the same State with the plaintiff, no jurisdiction could be exercised as between them, and no prejudice to the rights of either could be done.
Source: Wikisource

John McLean Clearwater v. Pleasant — Opinion of the Court

The several counts do not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; wherefore the defendants pray judgment, &c.
If this be regarded as a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, it is argued that the suit is brought on a joint contract executed by the defendants in error, when only two of them were served with process, and the third one, Caleb B. Smith, who, at the time of the commencement of the suit, was not a citizen of the State of Indiana, and is therefore not joined as a defendant herein, &c.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature