Summary

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Troxel v. Granville — Dissenting Opinion (2000)

But presumptions notwithstanding, we should recognize that there may be circumstances in which a child has a stronger interest at stake than mere protection from serious harm caused by the termination of visitation by a "person" other than a parent. The almost infinite variety of family relationships that pervade our ever-changing society strongly counsel against the creation by this Court of a constitutional rule that treats a biological parent's liberty interest in the care and supervision of her child as an isolated right that may be exercised arbitrarily.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Troxel v. Granville — Dissenting Opinion (2000)

Far from guaranteeing that parents' interests will be trammeled in the sweep of cases arising under the statute, the Washington law merely gives an individual-with whom a child may have an established relationship-the procedural right to ask the State to act as arbiter, through the entirely well-known best-interests standard, between the parent's protected interests and the child's.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature