Summary

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Zelman v. Simmons-Harris — Dissenting Opinion

Third, the voluntary character of the private choice to prefer a parochial education over an education in the public school system seems to me quite irrelevant to the question whether the government’s choice to pay for religious indoctrination is constitutionally permissible. Today, however, the Court seems to have decided that the mere fact that a family that cannot afford a private education wants its children educated in a parochial school is a sufficient justification for this use of public funds.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens Zelman v. Simmons-Harris — Dissenting Opinion

The State may choose to divide up its public schools into a dozen different options and label them magnet schools, community schools, or whatever else it decides to call them, but the State is still required to provide a public education and it is the State’s decision to fund private school education over and above its traditional obligation that is at issue in these cases.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature