Summary

Portrait of John Sarbanes John Sarbanes,  H.R. 1 Division B, Title IV, Subtitle C (2021)

“ Today, however, because the clear majority of the information on social media sites is uncurated and there is a rapid proliferation of information sources and other sites that can reinforce information, there is an increasing likelihood that the information available to average consumers may be inaccurate (whether intentionally or otherwise) and may be more easily manipulable than in prior eras.”. (13) Current regulations on political advertisements do not provide sufficient transparency to uphold the public’s right to be fully informed about political advertisements made online. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Sarbanes John Sarbanes,  H.R. 1 Division B, Title IV, Subtitle C (2021)

“ These communications are accessible to the press, fact-checkers, and political opponents; this creates strong disincentives for a candidate to disseminate materially false, inflammatory, or contradictory messages to the public. Social media platforms, in contrast, can target portions of the electorate with direct, ephemeral advertisements often on the basis of private information the platform has on individuals, enabling political advertisements that are contradictory, racially or socially inflammatory, or materially false. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Sarbanes John Sarbanes,  H.R. 1 Division B, Title IV, Subtitle C (2021)

“ In 2002, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act became law, establishing disclosure requirements for political advertisements distributed from a television or radio broadcast station or provider of cable or satellite television. In 2003, the Supreme Court upheld regulations on electioneering communications established under the Act, noting that such requirements “provide the electorate with information and insure that the voters are fully informed about the person or group who is speaking.”. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature