Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.

Name: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
Author: Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

Summary

“Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company”, published in 1892, is a work by Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.. It explores elements such as offer, advertisement and acceptance.

Quotes from Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.)

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ It is an offer made to all the world;and why should not an offer be made to all the world which is to ripen into a contract with anybody who comes forward and performs the condition? It is an offer to become liable to any one who,before it is retracted, performs the condition, and, although the offer is made to the world, the contract is made with that limited portion of the public who come forward and perform the condition on the faith of the advertisement. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ But there is this clear gloss to be made upon that doctrine, that as notification of acceptance is required for the benefit of the person who makes the offer, the person who makes the offer may dispense with notice to himself if he thinks it desirable to do so, and I suppose there can be no doubt that where a person in an offer made by him to another person, expressly or impliedly intimates a particular mode of acceptance as sufficient to make the bargain binding, it is only necessary for the other person to whom such offer is made to follow the indicated method of acceptance ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ In my judgment, the advertisement was an offer intended to be acted upon, and when accepted and the conditions performed constituted a binding promise on which an action would lie, assuming there was consideration for that promise. The defendants have contended that it was a promise in honour or an agreement or a contract in honour - whatever that may mean. I understand that if there is no consideration for a promise, it may be a promise in honour, or,as we should call it, a promise without consideration and nudum pactum ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ In many cases you look to the offer itself. In many cases you extract from the character of the transaction that notification is not required, and in the advertisement cases it seems to me to follow as an inference to be drawn from the transaction itself that a person is not to notify his acceptance of the offer before he performs the condition, but that if he performs the condition notification is dispensed with. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ It is quite obvious that in the view of the advertisers a use by the public of their remedy, if they can only get the public to have confidence enough to use it, will react and produce a sale which is directly beneficial to them.Therefore, the advertisers get out of the use an advantage which is enough to constitute a consideration. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ Inconvenience sustained by one party at the request of the other is enough to create a consideration. I think, therefore, that it is consideration enough that the plaintiff took the trouble of using the smoke ball. But I think also that the defendants received a benefit from this user, for the use of the smoke ball was contemplated by the defendants as being indirectly a benefit to them, because the use of the smoke balls would promote their sale. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ The defendants contend next, that it is an offer the terms of which are too vague to be treated as a definite offer, inasmuch as there is no limit of time fixed for the catching of the influenza, and it cannot be supposed that the advertisers seriously meant to promise to pay money to every person who catches the influenza at any time after the inhaling of the smoke ball. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L., Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892)

“ If I advertise to the world that my dog is lost, and that anybody who brings the dog to a particular place will be paid some money, are all the police or other persons whose business it is to find lost dogs to be expected to sit down and write me a note saying that they have accepted my proposal?Why, of course, they at once look after the dog, and as soon as they find the dog they have performed the condition. ”

Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.

Summary

Quotes from Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (Lindley, Bowen, Smith A.L.)

Common terms

Similar works

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature