Summary

Louis Brandeis Helvering v. Gowran — Opinion of the Court

Congress declared that the preferred stock should not be taxed as a dividend.
Second. The government contends that, even if section 115 (f) be construed as prohibiting taxation of the preferred stock dividend, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming the Commissioner's determination of a deficiency should be sustained, because the gain from sale of the stock within the year was taxable income and the entire proceeds must be deemed income, since the stock had cost Gowran nothing.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Helvering v. Gowran — Opinion of the Court

It held that there was no income, because, as stipulated, there was no difference between the value of the stock when received and its value when sold. The court likened a nontaxable stock dividend to a tax-free gift or legacy and said: 'One who receives a tax-free gift and later sells it, in the absence of statute providing otherwise, is taxed upon the profit arising from the difference in its value at the time he receives it and the sale price.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature