Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Taft v. Bowers — Opinion of the Court

In short, the question whether a dividend made out of company profits constitutes income of the stockholder is not affected by antecedent transfers of the stock from hand to hand.' There is nothing in the Constitution which lends support to the theory that gain actually resulting from the increased value of capital can be treated as taxable income in the hands of the recipient only so far as the increase occurred while he owned the property.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Taft v. Bowers — Opinion of the Court

The 'gain derived from capital,' within the definition, is 'not a gain accruing to capital, nor a growth or increment of value in the investment, but a gain, a profit, something of exchangeable value proceeding from the property, severed from the capital however invested, and coming in, that is, received or drawn by the claimant for his separate use, benefit and disposal.' United States v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature