Summary

Joseph McKenna Lynch v. Turrish — Opinion of the Court

Darlington, which is that the gradual advance in the value of property during a series of years in no just sense can be ascribed to a particular year, not therefore as 'arising or accruing,' to meet the challenge of the words, in the last one of the years, as the government contends, and taxable as income for that year or when turned into cash. Indeed, the case decides that such advance in value is not income at all, but merely increase of capital and not subject to a tax as income.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph McKenna Lynch v. Turrish — Opinion of the Court

The statute looks, with some exceptions, for subjects of taxation only to annual gains, profits, and income.'
'The mere fact that property has advanced in value between the date of its acquisition and sale does not authorize the imposition of a tax on the amount of the advance. Mere advance in value in no sense constitutes the gains, profits, or income specified by the statute.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature