Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Rutkin v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Petitioner's control over the cash so received was such that, in the absence of Reinfeld's unlikely repudiation of the transaction and demand for the money's return, petitioner could enjoy its use as fully as though his title to it were unassailable.
An unlawful gain, as well as a lawful one, constitutes taxable income when its recipient has such control over it that, as a practical matter, he derives readily realizable economic value from it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Rutkin v. United States — Opinion of the Court

There is little doubt now that where unlawful gains are secured by the fraud of the taxpayer they are taxable. [10] In the instant case it is not questioned that the $250,000 would have been taxable to petitioner if he had obtained it by fraudulently inducing Reinfeld to believe petitioner's false claims to be true. That being so, it would be an extraordinary result to hold here that petitioner is to be tax free because his fraud was so transparent that it did not mislead his victim and his victim paid him the money because of fear instead of fraud.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature