Summary

Louis Brandeis United States v. Kombst — Opinion of the Court

The Revenue Act of 1916, § 203 (a) (1) , under which the excise tax is laid, does not allow as a deduction from the gross estate a sum paid by way of succession tax, as distinguished from an estate tax. [1] Leach v. Nichols, 285 U.S. 165, 52 S.C.t. 338, 76 L. Ed. -; New York Trust Co. v. Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 350, 41 S.C.t. 506, 65 L. Ed. 963, 16 A. L. R. 660. Compare United States v. Woodward, 256 U.S. 632, 635, 41 S.C.t. 615, 65 L. Ed. 1131. Whether the California tax was a succession tax or an estate tax is to be determined by reference to the decisions of its highest court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature