Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar, Brown v. District of Columbia…
“ In the face of these facts, found almost wholly from the evidence on the part of the claimant, we are of the opinion that we would not be justified in finding that the alleged contract of December 10, 1872,-the one sued on here,-was such as the statute prescribes, or that it was a valid contract in any respect. By the thirty-seventh section of the act approved February 21, 1871, the board of public works is provided for, to consist of five persons, whose duties and powers it is said shall embrace the regulation and repair of the streets and highways of the District of Columbia. ”
