Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Delaware City Salem Philadelphia Steam-Boat Navigation Company v…

If, therefore, the company would avail itself of the fruits of the plaintiff's work and labor and services, it should pay him what they are worth, the same as a man who sees another working in his corn-field among other hired laborers should pay him what his labor was worth, if the jury in such case should be satisfied that there was, from the circumstances, evidence of a hiring.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Delaware City Salem Philadelphia Steam-Boat Navigation Company v…

If it be objected that the verdict of the jury could not have been rendered on the second count alone, because, although it appears from the record that the work and labor of prosecuting the claim to a successful termination was performed by the plaintiff, yet the record fails to show that any evidence was adduced upon the trial before the jury of the value of such work and labor and services, the answer is- (1) That the bill of exceptions does not purport to set out, even in substance, all the evidence bearing on the issues in the case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature