Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Washington Company v. McDade — Opinion of the Court

They are, however, bound to use all reasonable care and prudence for the safety of those in their service, by providing them with machinery reasonably safe and suitable for the use of the latter. If the employer or master fails in this duty of precaution and care, he is responsible for any injury which may happen through a defect of machinery which was or ought to have been known to him, and was unknown to the employe or servant.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Washington Company v. McDade — Opinion of the Court

The same remark is true of the instruction given by the court in lieu of the sixteenth one asked by the defendant. That instruction, as requested, was as follows: 'The employer is bound to use ordinary care and prudence in providing proper machinery, but he is not a guarantor of its safety. If he uses ordinary care and prudence he is absolved from responsibility.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Washington Company v. McDade — Opinion of the Court

On the other hand, the evidence offered by the plaintiff certainly tended to show that the injury would not have occurred but for the defect of the fixed pulley and the projecting screw; that the machinery was unsafe, and not such as was generally used in shops of that kind, as testified to by experienced machinists introduced by the plaintiff, and the only one examined in behalf of the defendant; that he (the plaintiff) was unaware of the dangers attendant upon putting on the belt by hand
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature