Summary

Mahlon Pitney,  Winton v. Amos Bounds — Opinion of the Court

“ However reasonable and well-intended these acts on the part of the claimants may have been-attributable as probably they were to zeal in the interests of the Indians-it cannot be said to be free from doubt that the efforts of claimants, taken as a whole, advanced the claims of the Mississippi Choctaws as a class to citizenship in the Nation and constituted a material factor in producing the ultimate advantageous result. ”
Source: Wikisource

Mahlon Pitney,  Winton v. Amos Bounds — Opinion of the Court

“ As we construe the jurisdictional acts under which these claims were submitted to the Court of Claims, they contemplate not an action in personam to establish a personal liability against individual Indians, or a group of Indians, but a suit of an equitable nature against that class of Mississippi Choctaws who, through successful assertion of the right of citizenship in the Choctaw Nation, acquired allotments of lands in what formerly was the tribal domain, and a participation in funds held in trust by the United states ”
Source: Wikisource

Mahlon Pitney,  Winton v. Amos Bounds — Opinion of the Court

“ The present suit is of that nature.
It is thoroughly established that Congress has plenary authority over the Indians and all their tribal relations, and full power to legislate concerning their tribal property. The guardianship arises from their condition of tutelage or dependency; and it rests with Congress to determine when the relationship shall cease; the mere grant of rights of citizenship not being sufficient to terminate it.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature