Melville Fuller,
Childers v. McClaughry — Opinion of the Court
“ Rep. 123, Lennon had been committed for contempt by the circuit court for the northern district of Ohio, and thereupon applied to the same court for a writ of habeas corpus, the petition alleging, as in this case, that he was restrained of his liberty in violation of the Constitution, and that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to commit him. ”
Melville Fuller,
Childers v. McClaughry — Opinion of the Court
“ Walsh, 193 U.S. 460, 470, 48 L. ed. 749, 753, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 489; Empire State Idaho Min. & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 51 L. ed. 779, 782, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 476.Appeal dismissed. Notes This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105) . ”
