Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Woods v. Nierstheimer — Opinion of the Court

A court's jurisdiction of the subject-matter is not determined by the plea which a person charged with a crime may interpose. Before he appeared at the bar of the tribunal, it either was or was not vested with jurisdiction of the subject matter of his cause. If the court possessed such jurisdiction, it was conferred by or pursuant to some provision of the Constitution, and not by the act or consent of the defendant.'↑ A judgment in a coram nobis proceeding is final and appealable in Illinois. See People ex rel.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Woods v. Nierstheimer — Opinion of the Court

The petitioner counters by calling attention to the fact that the statutory remedy is not available unless brought within five years after the rendition of a judgment; that the judgment and sentence against petitioner was rendered more than five years ago; that consequently, if petitioner has no remedy for habeas corpus, he has no remedy at all; that we should not assume that Illinois grants no relief to one whose imprisonment violates rights protected by the United States Constitution, cf.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature