Summary

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Jennings v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

If petitioners' claims may be resolved in a proceeding under the Act, either by an inquiry into the verity of their factual allegations or a finding that federal rights were waived during or after their trials, such resolution may proceed without further action by this Court. If Illinois does not provide an appropriate remedy for such a determination, petitioners may proceed without more in the United States District Court.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Jennings v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

While Illinois provides a transcript without cost to indigent defendants who have been sentenced to death, in the absence of some Illinois procedure to permit other indigent defendants to secure an adequate record petitioners could utilize the writ of error procedure only by purchasing the transcript within the limited period following conviction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Jennings v. Illinois — Opinion of the Court

The Attorney General of Illinois asks us to affirm the judgments below as resting upon an independent state ground even though he acknowledges that such action would permit petitioners to proceed in the District Court without more. But we do not lightly assume that a state has failed to provide any post-conviction remedy if a defendant is imprisoned in violation of constitutional rights.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature