Summary

Minnesota Company v. National Company…

This is another, and it is to be hoped the last attempt to persuade this court to reverse their decision in this case.
Where questions arise which affect titles to land it is of great importance to the public that when they are once decided they should no longer be considered open. Such decisions become rules of property, and many titles may be injuriously affected by their change. Legislatures may alter or change their laws, without injury, as they affect the future only
Source: Wikisource

Minnesota Company v. National Company…

Roberts, adjudged by this court at December Term, 1855. [1] The same title was again, as the court declared, brought in issue, and the same question again agitated. [2] When the question was heard at December Term, 1855, it was elaborately discussed by counsel and deliberately considered by the court, and a unanimous decision given in favor of the party claiming, as the present defendant in error now in fact claimed. Nevertheless, the losing party, unwilling to acquiesce in a single decision, brought the case again before the court by a second writ of error.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature