Summary

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite United States v. Le Bris — Opinion of the Court

As the answer to the first question in the affirmative necessarily covers all that is material in the others, they need not be further referred to, and it is consequently ordered that it be certified to the court below that the first question is answered in the affirmative, and that a further answer to the others is deemed unnecessary.
Notes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105) .
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite United States v. Le Bris — Opinion of the Court

Is the reservation of the Red Lake and Pembina Indians in Polk county, Minnesota, Indian country, within the meaning of section 2139 of the Revised Statutes of the United States? (2) What is meant by Indian country in the heading of chapter 4, tit. 28, of the Revised Statutes, and in the sections in that chapter which define crimes committed in Indian country? (3) Does section 5596 of the Revised Statutes repeal and abolish the definition of Indian country, found in section 1 of the trade and intercourse act of June 30, 1834, (4 St. 729?)
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature