Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne The Cherokee Tobacco — Opinion of the Court

Does the section thus construed deserve the severe strictures which have been applied to it? As before remarked, it extends the revenue laws over the Indian territories only as to liquors and tobacco. In all other respects the Indians in those territories are exempt. As regards those articles only the same duties are exacted as from our own citizens. The burden must rest somewhere. Revenue is indispensable to meet the public necessities.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne The Cherokee Tobacco — Opinion of the Court

A treaty may supersede a prior act of Congress, [8] and an act of Congress may supersede a prior treaty. [9] In the cases referred to these principles were applied to treaties with foreign nations. Treaties with Indian nations within the jurisdiction of the United States, whatever considerations of humanity and good faith may be involved and require their faithful and good faith may be inobligatory. They have no higher sanctity; and no greater inviolability or immunity from legislative invasion can be claimed for them.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne The Cherokee Tobacco — Opinion of the Court

They are beyond the sphere of judicial cognizance. In the case under consideration the act of Congress must prevail as if the treaty were not an element to be considered. If a wrong has been done the power of redress is with Congress, not with the judiciary, and that body, upon being applied to, it is to be presumed, will promptly give the proper relief.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature