Summary

Nathaniel Weyl Testimony corroborating Alger Hiss as member of CPUSA secret apparatus

Secondly, if I ever knew Reed Harris, I have no recollection of it. The only thing I do know is that the Reed Harris case, involving his expulsion or severance from Columbia occurred at a time when I was studying in London, so that I was not present at the campus at that time. And I can merely recollect discussion about it. But with this gap in time, I would not like to give any impression as to what Reed Harris was or was not. The fact that the Social Problems Club, which was Communist-dominated, defended him, does not necessarily mean that he himself was a Communist.
Source: Wikisource

Nathaniel Weyl Testimony corroborating Alger Hiss as member of CPUSA secret apparatus

In what year?
Mr. WEYL. This is the academic year of ’32–’33.
Senator SYMINGTON. I thought you were a Communist then.
Mr. WEYL. I became a Communist toward the middle of that academic year.
Senator SYMINGTON. I see.
Mr. WEYL. But I was sufficiently sympathetic to be brought on the board of a Communist-controlled student group of which I had previously been president. So that all I can recollect is really that the campaign on Reed Harris, which was discussed before me as past history, and in which I had no interest, was led by a group which was at the time under Communist control.
Source: Wikisource

Nathaniel Weyl Testimony corroborating Alger Hiss as member of CPUSA secret apparatus

Mr. WEYL. This was—I don’t know whether it still exists—the radical club of Columbia University. And I had been president of it during my undergraduate days for, I think, two years; at which time I was a Socialist and the club was Socialist. During the year of my absence, it fell under Communist domination. So, on my return, I joined the executive board of the Social Problems Club, and I can remember a discussion of the Reed Harris fight.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature