Summary

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee…

To permit legislative inquiry to proceed on less than an adequate foundation would be to sanction unjustified and unwarranted intrusions into the very heart of the constitutional privilege to be secure in associations in legitimate organizations engaged in the exercise of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights; to impose a lesser standard than we here do would be inconsistent with the maintenance of those essential conditions basic to the preservation of our democracy.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee…

The prior holdings that governmental interest in controlling subversion and the particular character of the Communist Party and its objectives outweigh the right of individual Communists to conceal party membership or affiliations by no means require the wholly different conclusion that other groups-concededly legitimate-automatically forfeit their rights to privacy of association simply because the general subject matter of the legislative inquiry is Communist subversion or infiltration.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee…

While in Sweezy it did not clearly appear that the persons about whom inquiry was made were themselves asserted to have Communist associations, the interest in political and associational privacy was no stronger there than here; if anything, the fact that the legitimate organization itself-rather than a witness suspected of subversive ties-is here put to questioning through its president and that it is its own membership records which are the objects of scrutiny makes the claimed right worthy of more-not less protection.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature