Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Beloit v. Morgan — Opinion of the Court

The plea of res judicata applies, except in special cases, not only to the points upon which the court was required by the parties to form an opinion and pronounce a judgment, but to every point which properly belonged to the subject of litigation, and which the parties, exercising reasonable diligence, might have brought forward at the time.'
A party can no more split up defences than indivisible demands, and present them by piecemeal in successive suits growing out of the same transaction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Beloit v. Morgan — Opinion of the Court

Buckbee sued him upon one of the notes in the Marine Court. Gardner set up as a defence, fraud in the sale and a want of consideration. A verdict and judgment were rendered in his favor. In a suit upon the other note, in the Common Pleas of the City of New York, the judgment in the Marine Court was held to be an estoppel upon the subject of fraud in the sale. Bouchaud v. Dias, [2] Doty v. Brown, [3] and Babcock v. Camp, [4] are to the same effect and equally cogent. Such has been the rule of the common law from an early period of its history down to the present time.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature