Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Cheever v. Wilson — Opinion of the Court

It is insisted that Cheever never resided in Indiana; that the domicil of the husband is the wife's, and that she cannot have a different one from his. The converse of the latter proposition is so well settled that it would be idle to discuss it. The rule is that she may acquire a separate domicil whenever it is necessary or proper that she should do so. The right springs from the necessity for its exercise, and endures as long as the necessity continues. [10] The proceeding for a divorce may be instituted where the wife has her domicil.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Cheever v. Wilson — Opinion of the Court

Soon after the divorce was granted Mrs. Cheever married Louis Worcester. On the 11th of December, 1858, Worcester and wife gave to Wilson an instrument whereby they assigned to him all her rents until he should have received the sum of $3000. On the 30th of December, 1858, Worcester and wife and Mrs. Hughes gave to Wilson an extension of his lease of the Avenue property for the term of ten years, from the 1st of October, 1860, being an addition of five years to the term of the last preceding lease. At the same time Mr. and Mrs. Worcester executed to him a further assignment of the rents.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature