Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Lewis v. Hawkins — Opinion of the Court

The seller under such circumstances has a vendor's lien, which is certainly not impaired by withholding the conveyance. The equitable estate of the vendee is alienable, descendible, and devisable in like manner as real estate held by a legal title. The securities for the purchase-money are personalty, and in the event of the death of the vendor, go to his personal representative. [2] It does not appear that the title-bond authorized Hawkins to take possession, or that he did so. If there were no such authority, and he entered into possession, he held as a licensee or tenant at will.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Lewis v. Hawkins — Opinion of the Court

He is regarded as a tenant at will to the trustee. 'Therefore, until this tenancy is determined there can be no adverse possession between the parties.' [9] The relation once established is presumed to continue, unless a distinct denial, or acts, or a possession inconsistent with it are clearly shown. [10]
In many of the cases it is held that the lien of the vendor under the circumstances of this case is substantially a mortgage. [11] It is well settled that the possession of the mortgagor is not adverse to that of the mortgagee.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature