Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Fisher v. Shropshire — Opinion of the Court

City of Dubuque, 20 Iowa, 440, the supreme court said:
'The right to a lien in favor of a vendor upon the real estate sold to a vendee is not based upon contract, nor is it properly an equitable mortgage; neither can it be regarded as a trust resulting to the vendor by reason of the vendee holding the estate with the purchase money unpaid. It is a simple equity raised and administered by courts of chancery. It is not measured by any fixed rules, nor does it depend upon any particular fact or facts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Fisher v. Shropshire — Opinion of the Court

Undoubtedly, a lien of the character we are considering may be defeated if the grantor or vendor do any act manifesting an intention not to rely on the land for security; but this must be an act substantially inconsistent with the continued existence of the lien, and cannot be inferred from the mere fact that the parties may not have contemplated the assertion of the lien in the first instance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Fisher v. Shropshire — Opinion of the Court

The courts of the United States enforce grantors' and vendors' liens if in harmony with the jurisprudence of the state in which the action is brought, and the principle upon which such a lien rests has been held to be that one who gets the estate of another ought not, in conscience, to be allowed to keep it without paying the consideration. Chilton v. Braiden's Adm'x, 2 Black, 458; Story, Eq. Jur. § 1219.
Although there is some contrariety of expression, the doctrine of a vendor's lien arising by implication seems to have been generally recognized in the state of Iowa.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature