Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne United States v. Babbit — Opinion of the Court

The act of May 17, 1848, (9 Stat., 231,) authorized registers and receivers to receive from the holders of warrants the fees therein specified, for their services in carrying out the provisions of the act of 1847, with a proviso, that where the warrant was located for the use of the volunteer to whom it was issued, no compensation should be charged either by the register or receiver.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne United States v. Babbit — Opinion of the Court

We are of opinion that the proviso referred to is not limited in its effect to the section where it is found, but that it was affirmed by Congress as an independent proposition, and applies alike to all officers of this class.
Whether the proviso in the appropriation act of 1856 is to be construed as referring to the 3d section of the act of 1852, according to its letter, or to the 2d section, as is claimed in behalf of the Government, we have not found it necessary to consider.
The views we have expressed are sufficient to decide thin case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature