Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Galveston Wharf Company v. City of Galveston…

If the bill can be taken to allege sufficiently any threat and intent of the defendant it does not show that the City will go beyond an exercise of the right of eminent domain. The allegation is, will attempt to partition or condemn. If questions can be raised about the constitutionality of the ordinance authorizing partition, the City may confine itself to condemnation, and will, so far as appears. But there is nothing to prevent the exercise of eminent domain by the legislative power.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Galveston Wharf Company v. City of Galveston…

The title of the Wharf Company to certain lands was established, but it was provided that the City should become owner of one-third of the Wharf Company's stock, which was to be increased to that end, and of an undivided one-third of the Wharf Company's property, in trust for the present and future inhabitants of Galveston-all to be inalienable except by a four-fifths vote of all the qualified voters.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature