Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Lawlor v. Loewe — Opinion of the Court

It requires more than the blindness of justice not to see that many branches of the United Hatters and the Federation of Labor, to both of which the defendants belonged, in pursuance of a plan emanating from headquarters, made use of such lists and of the primary and secondary boycott in their effort to subdue the plaintiffs to their demands. The union label was used and a strike of the plaintiffs' employees was ordered and carried out to the same end, and the purpose to break up the plaintiffs' commerce affected the quality of the acts.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Lawlor v. Loewe — Opinion of the Court

The jury could not but find that by the usage of the unions the acts complained of were authorized, and authorized without regard to their interference with commerce among the states. We think it unnecessary to repeat the evidence of the publicity of this particular struggle in the common newspapers and union prints, evidence that made it almost inconceivable that the defendants, all living in the neighborhood of the plaintiffs, did not know what was done in the specific case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature