Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Patch v. Wabash Railroad Company…

If any distinction were to be made it hardly could be adverse to the jurisdiction of Illinois, in view of the requirements of its Constitution and statutes, that a majority of the directors should be residents of Illinois, and that the corporation should keep a general office in that state. We are of opinion that the defendant must be regarded in this suit as a citizen of Illinois, and therefore as having had no right to remove.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Patch v. Wabash Railroad Company…

It is not reasonable to interpret it as making such a severance between the appointment, and the power to act which is a consequence of the appointment, as to leave the former unimpeachable in these proceedings, but its effect open to dispute. The words 'or act' may have reference more especially to executors, and may be a reminiscence of the ancient law, by which they derived their powers from the will,-a notion that has died hard.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Patch v. Wabash Railroad Company…

What would be the law in case of a suit brought in Illinois upon a cause of action which arose in Ohio is a question that may be left on one side, as also may be the decisions in cases where a corporation originally created in one state afterwards becomes compulsorily a corporation of another state for some purposes in order to extend its powers.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature