Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. United States v. Emery Bird Thayer Realty Company…

The argument that there is a distinction between claims 'arising under' (Judicial Code, § 24, first) and those 'founded upon' (id. § 24, twentieth) a law of the United States rests on the inadmissible premise that the great act of justice embodied in the jurisdiction of the court of claims is to be construed strictly and read with an adverse eye.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. United States v. Emery Bird Thayer Realty Company…

Eighteen months before the passage of the corporation tax law its members decided that the claimant should be organized, and it was, for the purpose of acquiring the Dry Goods Company's lands and of letting the same to the Dry Goods Company, the latter having the management of the property and assuming the responsibilities in respect of it. The only business done by the claimant was to keep up its corporate organization and to collect and distribute the rent received from its single lessee
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature