Summary

Opinion of the Majority of the Court delivered by Lady Paton in Application for Leave to Appeal to… (2016)

We consider that the mere fact that an issue is capable of being framed as a devolution issue does not mean that litigation should be allowed to continue over years and that, after final determination of the issues raised before this court, the unsuccessful litigant should be permitted to re‐frame the issue as devolution issue as an method of obtaining a route to appeal to the Supreme Court otherwise denied by the statutory scheme.
Source: Wikisource

Opinion of the Majority of the Court delivered by Lady Paton in Application for Leave to Appeal to… (2016)

We observe first, that there is no specification given of a devolution issue. We consider it, at best, premature to make reference to the decision‐making of the Scottish Ministers. But even assuming that a devolution issue was properly focused for the determination of the Supreme Court at this stage, we observe secondly that a disappointed litigant could routinely make such an assertion, at a very late stage of proceedings, and seek to change the focus of the litigation to date.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature