Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller United States v. Adams — Opinion of the Court

In other words, the framers of the rule, treating the appeal as taken within the meaning of the statute when the application is made for its allowance, provide that the delay in making out a proper statement of facts and judicial rulings, and then allowing the appeal (which C. J. Taney says, in Hudgins v. Kemp, 'is merely an authority to the clerk to transmit the record') , shall not operate to defeat the appeal.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller United States v. Adams — Opinion of the Court

This is precisely the character of finding which the rule of this court was intended to produce. The existence of the fraud or mistake set up in the pleading is one of the ultimate facts to which the law of the case must be applied, in rendering a judgment, and this court does not purpose to go behind the finding of the Court of Claims on that subject.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature