P. G. Wodehouse

P. G. Wodehouse

Summary

Portrait of P. G. Wodehouse P. G. Wodehouse Tales of St. Austin's — Chapter 5 (1903)

I have seldom seen anyone so astonished as Mellish was at these words. In the whole course of his professional experience, he had never met with a parallel case. It was hard on the poor man not to be allowed to speak his mind about a matter of four per cent in a book-paper, but what could he do? He could not proceed with his denunciation, for if Bradshaw's explanation turned out a sufficient excuse, he would have to withdraw it all again, and vast stores of golden eloquence would be wasted.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of P. G. Wodehouse P. G. Wodehouse Tales of St. Austin's — Chapter 5 (1903)

It was the eve of the Euripides examination in the Upper Fourth. Euripides is not difficult compared to some other authors, but he does demand a certain amount of preparation. Bradshaw was a youth who did less preparation than anybody I have ever seen, heard of, or read of, partly because he preferred to peruse a novel under the table during prep., but chiefly, I think, because he had reduced cribbing in form to such an exact science that he loved it for its own sake, and would no sooner have come tamely into school with a prepared lesson than a sportsman would shoot a sitting bird.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of P. G. Wodehouse P. G. Wodehouse Tales of St. Austin's — Chapter 5 (1903)

If we had been doing Homer, we should have felt more in touch with Bradshaw. There's a good deal of similarity, when you come to compare them, between Homer and Haggard. They both deal largely in bloodshed, for instance. As events proved, the Euripides paper, like many things which seem formidable at a distance, was not nearly so bad as I had expected. I did a fair-to-moderate paper, and Kendal and White both seemed satisfied with themselves.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature