Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Company…
“ When it is exercised in satisfaction of a meritorious claim which the government created upon valuable consideration and which it must be taken to have intended to satisfy (so far as it may be satisfied within the territorial limits laid down) , it seems to us that lands within those limits should not be excluded simply because in a different event they would have been subject to a paramount claim.'The ultimate obligation of the government in respect of the indemnity lands is on the same plane as that respecting the lands in place. The only difference is in the mode of identification. ”
