Summary

Peter Vivian Daniel Henderson v. Anderson — Opinion of the Court

The reception of this deposition was objected to on the ground that John Henderson, as a member of the firm by whom and at the time the endorsement was made, was incompetent to testify to facts tending to invalidate the bill; the court sustained this objection, and rejected the deposition of John Henderson. To the ruling of the court on this point the defendant took an exception, which was reserved to him.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature