Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of Montana…

When state court jurisdiction over reservation Indians rests on tribal legislation, as distinct from a permanent federal authorization, the interests of the reservation Indians are fully protected by their ability to repeal the grant of jurisdiction to the state courts and thereby to return exclusive jurisdiction to their own courts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of Montana…

Before deciding this case the Court requested the Solicitor General to submit the views of the United States, whose law the Court now interprets as controlling. I should have thought the most basic principles of fair play would dictate a like request to the Blackfeet Tribal Council before the Court strikes down its law as invalid.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature