Potter Stewart, United States v… “ The United States argues that the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone flatly prohibits the drawing of bay-closing lines to islands. A true bay, it is said, is an 'indentation' within the mainland, and it cannot be created by the 'projection' of an island or islands from the coast. Moreover, the rule of Article 7 (3) that the area of an indentation lies between the closing line and 'the low-water mark around the shore of the indentation' contemplates a perimeter of dry land unbroken by any opening other than the bay's entrance. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Coolidge v… “ If it is reasonable for the police to make a warrantless nighttime entry for the purpose of arresting a person in his bed, then surely it must be reasonable as well to make a warrantless entry to search for and seize vital evidence of a serious crime. If the police may, without a warrant, seize and search an unoccupied vehicle parked on the owner's private property, not being used for any illegal purpose, then it is hard to see why they need a warrant to seize and search a suitcase, a trunk, a shopping bag, or any other portable container in a house, garage, or back yard. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ The Congress can of course mitigate the severity of capital punishment. The goal of limiting the death penalty to cases is which a jury recommends it is an entirely legitimate one. But that goal can be achieved without penalizing those defendants who plead not guilty and demand jury trial. In some States, for example, the choice between life imprisonment and capital punishment is left to a jury in every case-regardless of how the defendant's guilt has been determined. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Investment Company Institute v… “ It is argued that a bank investment fund simply makes available to the small investor the benefit of investment management by a bank trust department which would otherwise be available only to large investors, and that the operation of an investment fund creates no problems that are not present whenever a bank invests in securities for the account of customers. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Georgia v… “ The Court distinguished the situation in Strauder:'It is to be observed that (§ 641) gives the right of removal only to a person 'who is denied, or cannot enforce, in the judicial tribunals of the State his equal civil rights.' And this is to appear before trial. When a statute of the State denies his right, or interposes a bar to his enforcing it, in the judicial tribunals, the presumption is fair that they will be controlled by it in their decisions; and in such a case a defendant may affirm on oath what is necessary for a removal. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, American Ship Building Company v… “ The lockout may well dissuade employees from adhering to the position which they initially adopted in the bargaining, but he right to bargain collectively does not entail any 'right' to insist on one's position free from economic disadvantage. Proper analysis of the problem demands that the simple intention to support the employer's bargaining position as to compensation and the like be distinguished from a hostility to the process of collective bargaining which could suffice to render a lockout unlawful. See National Labor Relations Board v. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ The respondents' principal contention is that breeding livestock are simply not the type of asset that is properly includible in inventory. Just as manufacturers do not put capital equipment in inventory, so, respondents claim, they need not place their breeding livestock in inventory. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Hoffman v… “ The only consideration of the Court not resting on the 'plain meaning' of § 1404 (a) is that it would constitute 'gross discrimination' to permit transfer to be made with the defendant's consent and over the plaintiff's objection to a district to which the plaintiff could not similarly obtain transfer over the defendant's objection. To speak of such a situation as regards this statute as 'discrimination' is a sterile use of the concept. Mutuality is not an empty or abstract doctrine; it summarizes the reality of fair dealing between litigants. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Jenness v… “ Any other political organization is a 'political body.' [7] 'Political parties' conduct primary elections, regulated in detail by state law, and only the name of the candidate for each office who wins this primary election is printed on the ballot at the subsequent general election, as his party's nominee for the office in question. [8] A nominee of a 'political body' or an independent candidate, on the other hand, may have his name printed on the ballot at the general election by filing a nominating petition. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ The United States argues that the area within East Bay enclosed by Louisiana's proposed line does not constitute a bay because there is no 'well-marked indentation' with identifiable headlands which encloses 'landlocked' waters. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Georgia v… “ Rives, however, the defendants could point to no such state statute as the basis for removal. Their petition alleged that strong community racial prejudice existed against them, that the grand and petit jurors summoned to try them were all white, that Negroes had never been allowed to serve on county juries in cases in which a Negro was involved in any way, and that the judge, the prosecutor, and the assistant prosecutor had all rejected their request that Negroes be included in the petit jury. Hence, the defendants maintained, they could not obtain a fair trial in the state court. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Nicholas v… “ The entire amount of interest sought by the United States represents interest claimed for the liquidating bankruptcy period. Since we hold that the accumulation of interest on debts incurred during Chapter XI proceedings is suspending on the date the petition in the superseding bankruptcy is filed, it is clear that the United States is not entitled to the interest that it seeks on the taxes in this case. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, American Ship Building Company v… “ To buttress its decision as to the balance struck in this particular case, the Board points out that the employer has been given other weapons to counterbalance the employees' power of strike. The employer may permanently replace workers who have gone out on strike, or, by stockpiling and subcontracting, maintain his commercial operations while the strikers bear the economic brunt of the work stoppage. Similarly, the employer can institute unilaterally the working conditions which he desires once his contract with the union has expired. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Hoffa v… “ It appears to the court to be the true sense of the rule that no witness is compellable to furnish any one of them against himself. * * *' United States v. Burr (In re Willie) , 25 Fed.Cas. 38, 40 (No. 14,692e) (C.C.D.Va.1807) . (Emphasis supplied.) ↑ Petitioner maintains that the cross-examination of one of these character witnesses at the Test Fleet trial shows that the prosecution availed itself of the information transmitted by Partin. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ For ranchers who have elected the cash method of accounting, the current deduction is of course taken against ordinary income in the year the expense is paid. Since, as a result, the adjusted basis of the breeding animals at the time of sale is zero, the entire proceeds of the sales are reported as capital gains.Because of the mechanics of the accrual method of accounting used by the respondents, however, their current deductions for the expenses of raising their livestock were offset by the annual increments in the unit inventory values of the animals not sold during the taxable year. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Investment Company Institute v… “ It is not the slightest reflection on the integrity of the mutual fund industry to say that the traditions of that industry are not necessarily the conservative traditions of commercial banking. The needs and interests of a mutual fund enterprise more nearly approximate those of securities underwriting, the activity in which bank security affiliates were primarily engaged. When a bank puts itself in competition with mutual funds, the bank must make an accommodation to the kind of ground rules that Congress firmly concluded could not be prudently mixed with the business of commercial banking. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ In any meaningful sense, the structure of the Los Angeles grocery market remains unthreatened by concentration. Local competition is vigorous to a fault, not only among chain stores themselves but also between chain stores and single-store operators. The continuing population explosion of the Los Angeles area, which has outrun the expansion plans of even the largest chains, offers a surfeit of business opportunity for stores of all sizes. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ A concomitant of the special dispensation that has been made available to cash-method ranchers is the favorable capital gain treatment that results whenever breeding livestock are sold. The respondents, however, have demonstrated their intent to retain the accuracies of the unit-livestock-price method of accounting for animals they have raised for sale. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Elkins v… “ In the second place, in light of the holding of Wolf that state courts may admit evidence like that involved in these cases, it cannot be said that there is any sufficient justification based upon controlling the conduct of state officers for excluding such evidence from federal courts, as the Court would do, when gathered by state officials whose States would admit it. The underlying assumption on which the exclusionary rule of Weeks rests is that barring evidence illegally secured will have an inhibiting, one hopes a civilizing, influence upon law officers. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, North Carolina v… “ It would be a high price indeed for society to pay were every accused granted immunity from punishment because of any defect sufficient to constitute reversible error in the proceedings leading to conviction. From the standpoint of a defendant, it is at least doubtful that appellate courts would be as zealous as they now are in protecting against the effects of improprieties at the trial or pretrial stage if they knew that reversal of a conviction would put the accused irrevocably beyond the reach of further prosecution. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Hoffman v… “ At the other extreme there may be no rigid venue provisions, but all venue may be determined, upon the defendant's objection to the plaintiff's choice of forum, by a finding of fact in each case of what is the most convenient forum from the point of view of the parties and the court. The element of undesirability in the second extreme is that it involves too much preliminary litigation; it is desirable in that it makes venue responsive to actual convenience. The first extreme is undesirable for according too little, in fact nothing, to actual convenience when the case is a special one ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ It is only among single-store operators that the decline in the unit number of competitors, so heavily relied upon by the Court, has taken place. Yet the tables reproduced in the Appendix show not a trace of merger activity involving the acquisition of single-store operators. And the number of chains in the area has in fact shown a substantial net increase during the period, in spite of the fact that some of the chains have been absorbed by larger firms. How then can the Court rely on these acquisitions as evidence of a tendency toward market concentration in the area? ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Elkins v… “ State law seeking to control improper methods of law enforcement is frustrated by the Court's new rule whenever a State which enforces an exclusionary rule places restrictions upon the conduct of its officers not directly required by the Fourth Amendment with regard to federal officers. The Court's new rule will, for example, admit evidence illegally seized under a state law which is identical to a federal statute restricting federal officers, so long as the federal statute goes beyond the minimum requirements of the Constitution. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Oregon v… “ It is a plain fact of history that the Framers never imagined that the national Congress would set the qualifications for voters in every election from President to local constable or village alderman. It is obvious that the whole Constitution reserves to the States the power to set voter qualifications in state and local elections, except to the limited extent that the people through constitutional amendments have specifically narrowed the powers of the States. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, North Carolina v… “ It is my view that if for any reason a new trial is granted and there is a conviction a second time, the second penalty imposed cannot exceed the first penalty, i respect is had for the guarantee against double jeopardy.The theory of double jeopardy is that a person need run the gantlet only once. The gantlet is the risk of the range of punishment which the State or Federal Government imposes for that particular conduct. It may be a year to 25 years, or 20 years to life, or death. He risks the maximum permissible punishment when first tried. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, United States v… “ A low-tide elevation is a naturally-formed area of land which is surrounded by and above water at low-tide but submerged at high tide. Where a low-tide elevation is situated wholly or partly at a distance not exceeding the breadth of the territorial sea from the mainland or an island, the low-water line on that elevation may be used as the baseline for measuring the breadth of the territorial sea. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Bell v… “ A soldier's entitlement to pay is dependent upon statutory right. In the Armed Forces, as everywhere else, there are good men and rascals, courageous men and cowards, honest men and cheats. If a soldier's conduct falls below a specified level he is subject to discipline, and his punishment may include the forfeiture of future but not of accrued pay. [12] But a soldier who has not received such a punishment from a duly constituted court-martial is entitled to the statutory pay and allowances of his grade and status, however ignoble a soldier he may be. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Witherspoon v… “ If the State had excluded only those prospective jurors who stated in advance of trial that they would not even consider returning a verdict of death, it could argue that the resulting jury was simply 'neutral' with respect to penalty. [18] But when it swept from the jury all who expressed conscientious or religious scruples against capital punishment and all who opposed it in principle, the State crossed the line of neutrality. In its quest for a jury capable of imposing the death penalty, the State produced a jury uncommonly willing to condemn a man to die. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎
Potter Stewart, Coolidge v… “ In times not altogether unlike our own they won-by legal and constitutional means in England, [9] and by revolution on this continent-a right of personal security against arbitrary intrusions by official power. If times have changed, reducing everyman's scope to do as he pleases in an urban and industrial world, the changes have made the values served by the Fourth Amendment more, not less, important. [10] The State's first theory is that the seizure on February 19 and subsequent search of Coolidge's Pontiac were 'incident' to a valid arrest. ” [↩︎] Source: Wikisource ▶︎