Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v…

The Commission is directed to disapprove any agreement
'that it finds to be unjustly discriminatory or unfair as between carriers, shippers, exporters, importers, or ports, or between exporters from the United States and their foreign competitors, or to operate to the detriment of the commerce of the United States, or to be contrary to the public interest, or to be in violation of (the Act) * * *.' [17]
An agreement filed with and approved by the Commission is immunized from challenge under the antitrust laws.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v…

The petitioner, a German manufacturer of automobiles, is one of the largest users of the ports on the West Coast of the United States, delivering through them more than 40,000 vehicles each year, the majority transported there by vessels chartered by the petitioner rather than by common carrier. This case grows out of the petitioner's claim that charges imposed upon the unloading of its automobiles at Pacific Coast ports are in violation of the Shipping Act, 1916, as amended.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature