Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Wolfe v. North Carolina — Opinion of the Court

It is true that there is language in North Carolina cases, to which the State has called our attention, that indicates that a record settled by agreement-rather than by the trial court-may only be corrected by agreement. See Smith v. Capital Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 221 N.C. 202, 19 S.E.2d 626; Gorham v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co., supra. And language from State v. Dee, 214 N.C. 509, 512, 199 S.E. 730, 732, quoted by the Court in another connection, suggests that the state court is disinclined to permit the correction of a defective record when the case on appeal is settled by the parties.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Wolfe v. North Carolina — Opinion of the Court

There is no issue here as to the constitutional right of Negroes to use a public golf course free of racial discrimination. From first to last the courts of North Carolina fully recognized that under the Constitution these appellants could not be convicted if they were excluded from the golf course because of their race. The trial judge so instructed the jury, and the Supreme Court of North Carolina so held.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Wolfe v. North Carolina — Opinion of the Court

The appellants were convicted of violating a North Carolina criminal trespass statute, [1] and their convictions were upheld by the Supreme Court of North Carolina, 248 N.C. 485, 103 S.E.2d 846. This appeal, grounded on 28 U.S.C. § 1257 (2) , 28 U.S.C.A. § 1257 (2) , [2] attacks the constitutional validity of the statute as applied in this case. Because of doubt as to whether any substantial federal question was presented to or decided by the state courts, we postponed further consideration of the question of jurisdiction until the hearing of the case on the merits.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature