Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Moore v. Ogilvie — Dissent

Even if the interests of voters in Illinois' 'populous counties' were actually represented here, the Court's conclusion would still be completely unjustified. Reynolds v. Sims, supra, and its offspring at least involved situations in which the 'debasement' or 'dilution' of voting power found by the Court was the 'certain' result of population variations among electoral districts. Under the Illinois statute now before us, however, no injury whatever is suffered by voters in heavily populated areas so long as their favored candidates are able to secure places on the ballot.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Moore v. Ogilvie — Dissent

Ill.Rev.Stat., c. 46, § 10-3, involved here, imposes identical signature requirements for independent candidates.↑ While MacDougall involved candidates for various offices, the appellants here all sought election as presidential electors. See U.S.Const., Art. II, § 1: 'Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress * * *.' (Emphasis added.)
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature